|
Performance by its nature resists conclusions, just
as it resists the sort of definitions, boundaries, and limits so
useful to traditional academic writing and academic structures.
It may be helpful, then, to consider these observations as a sort
of anticonclusion to a study of this antidiscipline, framed in the
mode of self-reflexivity, a mode that characterizes much modern
(or postmodern) performative consciousness, whether one is speaking
of theatrical performance, social performance, ethnographic or anthropological
performance, linguistic performance, or, as in the present case,
the performance of writing a scholarly study.

Carlson, M. A. (1996). Performance:
a critical introduction. Londres: Routledge, 247p.

|