|
Indeed, the stretch between theatrical and deconstructive
meanings of "performative" seems to span the polarities
of, at either extreme, the extroversion of the actor, the introversion
of the signifier. Michael Fried's opposition between theatricality
and absorption seems custom-made for this paradox about "performativity":
in its deconstructive sense, performativity signals absorption;
in the vicinity of the stage, however, the performative is the theatrical.
But in another range of usages, a text like Lyotards The Postmodern
Condition uses "performativity" to mean an extreme of
something like efficiency-postmodern representation as a form of
capitalist efficiency-while, again, the deconstructive "performativity"
of Paul de Man or J. Hillis Miller seems to be characterized by
the dislinkage precisely of cause and effect between the signifier
and the world.

Parker, A. et Sedwick, E. K. (éd.)
(1995). Performativity and performance. New York: Routledge,
239p.

|