|
According to Bauman, all performance involves a consciousness
of doubleness, through which the actual execution of an action is
placed in mental comparison with a potential, an ideal, or a remembered
original model of that action. Normally this comparison is made
by an observer of the action - the theatre public, the school's
teacher, the scientist-but the double consciousness, not the external
observation, is what is most central. An athlete, for example, may
be aware of his own performance, placing it against a mental standard.
Performance is always performance for someone, some audience that
recognizes and validates it as performance even when, as is occasionally
the case, that audience is the self.
When we consider the various kinds of activity that are referred
to on the modern cultural scene as "performance" or "performance
art," these are much better understood in relation to this
over-arching semantic field than to the more traditional orientation
suggested by the piano-playing Ms. Pritchard, who felt that so long
as she was not displaying a virtuosic skill she could not be "performing."
Some modern "performance" is centrally concerned with
such skills (as in the acts of some of the clowns and jugglers included
among the so-called "new vaudevillians"), but much more
central to this phenomenon is the sense of an action carried out
for someone, an action involved in the peculiar doubling that comes
with consciousness and with the elusive "other" that performance
is not but which it constantly struggles in vain to embody.
Although traditional theatre has regarded this "other"
as a character in a dramatic action, embodied (through performance)
by an actor, modern performance art has, in general, not been centrally
concerned with this dynamic. Its practitioners, almost by definition,
do not base their work upon characters previously created by other
artists, but upon their own bodies, their own autobiographies, their
own specific experiences in a culture or in the world, made performative
by their consciousness of them and the process of displaying them
for audiences. Since the emphasis is upon the performance, and on
how the body or self is articulated through performance, the individual
body remains at the center of such presentations. Typical performance
art is solo art, and the typical performance artist uses little
of the elaborate scenic surroundings of the traditional stage, but
at most a few props, a bit of furniture, and whatever costume (sometimes
even nudity) is most suitable to the performance situation.
It is not surprising that such performance has become a highly visible
- one might almost say emblematic-art form in the contemporary world,
a world that is highly self-conscious, reflexive, obsessed with
simulations and theatricalizations in every aspect of its social
awareness. With performance as a kind of critical wedge, the metaphor
of theatricality has moved out of the arts into almost every aspect
of modem attempts to understand our condition and activities, into
almost every branch of the human sciences-sociology, anthropology,
ethnography, psychology, linguistics. And as performativity and
theatricality have been developed in these fields, both as metaphors
and as analytic tools, theorists and practitioners of performance
art have in turn become aware of these developments and found in
them new sources of stimulation, inspiration, and insight for their
own creative work and the theoretical understanding of it.
***
Cultural performance may indeed function as a kind of metacommentary
on its society, and may be best studied in that function by ethnographers,
but neither performers nor spectators can be primarily characterized
as consciously seeking out cultural performance as metacommentary
on their culture. In "theatrical" performance, however,
this concern is central. Performers and audience alike accept that
a primary function of this activity is precisely cultural and social
metacommentary, the exploration of self and other, of the world
as experienced, and of alternative possibilities.

Carlson, M. A. (1996). Performance:
a critical introduction. Londres: Routledge, 247p.

|